Everton: too good for investment?
For years now, Everton fans have been dumbfounded as to why no investor has come forward to purchase the club. This is not simply a case of blind favour or bias, but a view which incorporates the club's history, huge fanbase, international appeal, current staff and ability to progress. Last night's Dispatches documentary on Channel 4 may now finally shed light on the issue.
The documentary showed England legend Bryan Robson wheeling and dealing with, at best, delusional, at worst, corrupt and powerful Joe Sim, describing in harrowing detail the ease with which a football club can be bought and sold for profit.
The clubs mentioned as potential investment opportunities - Leicester City, Sheffield Wednesday, Sheffield United for example - all represent teams that have slumped through relegation to a lower league not representative of the clubs' stature. In business terms, if these clubs can be returned to their former states ie the Premiership, they have a large potential for profit.
The question Evertonians ought to ask themselves in light of this is can the same be said of Everton?
To explain what I mean, it is best to contextualise Everton's status relative to other Premiership clubs. If the top six (Man Utd, Chelsea, Man City, Arsenal, Tottenham, Liverpool) are taken out of the equation for a second and 14 Premiership clubs are left in a hypothetical mini-league, Everton would represent the best performing side in this league over the last 5/6 years.
Past Europa League campaigns have indubitably taught Everton fans that in order for Everton to progress in both football and financial terms, Everton need to be qualifying for the Champions League at least, and ultimately challenging for the Premiership title.
Put simply, this is completely implausible such is the inability of a team like Everton to compete with the financial muscle of teams like Chelsea, Manchester United and recently Liverpool and Manchester City.
Everton cannot be bought cheaply in the way that a Sheffield Wednesday can, and even if investment were to come, Everton could not offer anything like the same potential for profit that a team like Wednesday can.
Since money was heavily injected into football to revolutionize the game, Everton have been at their highest peak during the Moyes era, their top market value you could say.
The cruel irony of this all is that if Everton and David Moyes weren't doing as well as they are, they would be a more attractive proposition for a potential buyer. As they slipped down the league table, their value would fall and their potential for profit would rise.
This means that the club are truly stagnant: bereft of the investment needed to progress, and needing to fail to become investable.
Older/Newer
« Latest Everton FC news from the Liverpool ECHO - Neville: Moyes will give young Blues a chance, Howard's USA homecoming | Latest Everton FC news from the Liverpool ECHO - Neville: Europe is a minimum for Blues, Moyes on life in the USA »




Finally, someone saying how it actually is.
Some people are far too quick to blame the current board and chairman.
This is nothing more than stupidity! Correct if I'm wrong but were Chelsea not challenging for the tittle an had big star names ie gullit, vialli, di matteo, wise, an the magical Zola to name but a few. This did not stop mr abromvich form coming an purchasing the club. Also recently there have been many takovers when the clubs are in the same position as ourselves. Villa, Newcastle, them up the road, an least we forget man city. We have no investor for the simple reason that kenwright an the rest of the board want a sizeable chunk of profit for barely no investment. It doesn't take a genius to see we are where we are today because of SIR David moyes performing miracles on a shoe string.
Now you should keep you idiotic 6th form views to your self, or go an cash the cheque that kenwright gave you to write such a stupid piece.....
Man City have only been elevated to the status of top 4 since a succesful takeover.
Their financial muscle is as a result of the takeover.
Liverpool's rebirth has been as a result of a takeover.
Both clubs were bought because there was a desire on behalf of the current owners to sell. Can the same be said of Kenwright et al
Dixie Dean - if you are going to write such things, you really should not tempt people by saying 'correct me if I'm wrong', but you have said it now so I will. Not only were Chelsea never challenging for the title before Abramovich, the highest they had finished in the Premiership before him was third. Secondly, every single player you just mentioned had left Chelsea by the time Abramovich arrived, in the case of Vialli and Gullit, four years earlier.
The position of the club now compared to the position of the club when Kenwright took over is much, much, much better. Put simply, Kenwright has been very, very good for this club. Unfortunately, we have entered an age when money is everything, and not just millions of pounds, but hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of millions of pounds are needed consistently to even compete let alone win. Admittedly, he is not at all open with the fans and that is a serious flaw of his, but to blame him for the club's state is not only misinformed, ignorant and reactionary, but also downright wrong and completely unfair.
Chris Smith, so please explain who was to blame for the Kings Dock fiasco,NTL,Fortress Fund,Kirkby and numerous other blunders?
In the words of Widow Twanky "watch this space"
Chris Smith, so please explain who was to blame for the Kings Dock fiasco,NTL,Fortress Fund,Kirkby and numerous other blunders?
In the words of Widow Twanky "watch this space"
Now I'm like, well duh! Truly thnafkul for your help.